This is an official ODERSA website. Here’s how you know
The official domain

The address of this site ends in odersa.org. Every service the association runs sits on a subdomain of odersa.org and nowhere else. If the address in your browser’s address bar does not end in odersa.org, this site is not ours.

Free, and no account

Everything is open straight away. No sign-up, no account, no password, no subscription, no advertising. Nothing is held back for those who pay, because there is nothing to pay for.

No data collected

This site does not follow you: no tracker, no tracking cookie, no measurement tool built into these pages, and nothing measured on your device. Our host counts requests in aggregate, as any server that answers does: a total, never a profile. You do not have to take our word for it: open your browser’s developer tools, go to the Network tab, and reload the page. You will see the full list of what the site asks for. Everything comes from odersa.org, nothing goes anywhere else.

Free to reuse

The content is published under the CC BY 4.0 licence. You may copy it, translate it, print it and pass it on, for your classes as much as for the people around you, on one condition only: credit ODERSA.

FrançaisEnglishEspañolالعربيةहिन्दीবাংলা中文

← Back to the blog

Published on 2026-07-25

Did a celebrity really message you about a prize?


A woman in Alabama sent $17,500 believing Blake Shelton had picked her as his 'fan of the year'. Here's the tell that gives these DMs away every time.

A message arrives, and it's from someone huge: a singer, an actor, a name you've followed for years. They noticed you. Maybe you won something, maybe they just want to talk. Your first reaction isn't suspicion, it's disbelief in the good kind: is this actually happening to me? That flutter of disbelief is exactly the emotion the scam is built to produce, and exactly the one worth pausing on.

These stories rarely stay small. According to AARP, a woman in Alabama sent $17,500 in wire transfers after being told she'd been selected as country singer Blake Shelton's 'fan of the year'. Another victim sent more than $23,000 to someone posing as Led Zeppelin's Robert Plant. Elon Musk, Michael Bolton, Dolly Parton, Keanu Reeves: the names change, the script barely does. Impostor scams, the broader category these fall under, cost people in the US nearly $2.95 billion in 2024, according to FTC data cited by AARP, making it one of the largest fraud categories reported that year.

The math a real star doesn't need to do

Here's the detail that unravels almost every version of this scam: the fee. You've won a prize, a signed guitar, a meet and greet, cash, and to receive it you just need to cover shipping, or taxes, or a small processing charge. The FTC has logged exactly this pattern: fans told a celebrity has picked them for a prize, then asked to send money before anything is ever delivered.

Sit with that logic for a second. A performer worth tens or hundreds of millions of dollars is not going to ask a fan to prepay eleven dollars in shipping. If the prize is real, the giver can absorb the cost of sending it; that's what 'giving away' means. A request for money, however small, flips the entire transaction: you're no longer the winner, you're the customer, and the thing you're buying is a story.

The size of the fee doesn't matter. The moment a free prize needs your card number, it stopped being free.

The giveaway version is only one flavour of the same trick. Fraudulent ads have also circulated showing weight-loss products falsely promoted using Oprah Winfrey's likeness, where a 'free trial' quietly turns into a recurring charge once someone has handed over their card. No prize was involved that time, just a familiar face borrowed to make an ordinary purchase feel endorsed. The mechanism is identical either way: use a name you trust to lower your guard right before the payment step.

That little blue check means less than it looks like

Part of what makes these messages land is the verified badge or the professional-looking profile sitting behind them. The FTC's advice cuts straight through the confusion: don't assume a celebrity post, image, or video is legitimate until you've verified it came from an official source. A checkmark, a follower count, a familiar profile photo, none of it proves the account belongs to the person it claims to.

Artificial intelligence has made the illusion harder to spot, not easier. AARP reports that scammers now clone celebrity voices from just a few seconds of audio and generate convincing video for fake livestreams and endorsements, which means a video 'confirming' the giveaway isn't the reassurance it used to be. The performance can be manufactured start to finish.

What to actually check

Search the celebrity's name alongside the exact claim: a real contest run by a real public figure leaves a trail across official channels, management statements, verified accounts with a long posting history, sometimes press coverage. If the only place this 'giveaway' exists is a single DM in your inbox, that silence elsewhere is the answer, not a gap in your searching. And if any version of the message asks for a card number, a wire transfer, or a gift card code to release a prize you never entered to win, you already have everything you need to know.

Topics: impersonation giveaway scams social media

Sources

Keyboard shortcuts

?Open this help
EscClose the panel or this help
1-3Pick an answer during the quiz
EnterNext case, once you've read the answer
TabMove from link to link: the whole site works by keyboard