FrançaisEnglishEspañolالعربيةहिन्दीবাংলা中文

← The case library

Scams & easy money


30 cases in this category

Easy

What's the main warning sign?

You get an email from a personal email address. A man introduces himself as a lawyer representing an international law firm. He explains that you're inheriting two million euros from a distant relative you'd never heard of, who died without a will. But before you can receive the money, you first need to pay a 500-euro processing fee to release the inheritance.

  1. You'd never heard of this relative, so it must be fake
  2. The email comes from a personal address, not an official one
  3. You're being asked to pay money in order to receive more money
See the answer and the explanation

The right answer: You're being asked to pay money in order to receive more money

The scam runs on this logic: to unlock a supposedly huge payout, they ask you to front a small “fee” first. But a real inheritance goes through a local notary or estate lawyer, never through a payment to a stranger online. The move: always check with a licensed notary before handing over a cent.

Related reflex(es) : 6. Too good to be true? · 1. Who is speaking?

Why is this a warning sign?

In a group chat, someone shares a screenshot: an investment portfolio that supposedly turned into 50,000 in three months, from a plan that pays 10% every week. He says: “It's simple, it's easy, and it's for everyone. Join me, this changes your life!”

  1. An investment that guarantees 10% every week is financially impossible
  2. Investments that make serious money are always reserved for wealthy people
  3. Sharing a screenshot proves it's real, since you can see the result
See the answer and the explanation

The right answer: An investment that guarantees 10% every week is financially impossible

Financial markets simply don't allow returns that are both this regular and this enormous. Every real investment carries risk. When someone promises fixed, massive gains, it's either a scam or an illusion built to look like one. The move: find out where the money actually goes, and who really benefits from the system.

Related reflex(es) : 6. Too good to be true? · 7. What is it selling me?

What shouldn't let you click?

You get a text: “Security alert: your bank account will be suspended tonight unless you reconnect. Click here to verify immediately: [link].” The message appears to come from your bank's usual number. Panic kicks in.

  1. A made-up sense of urgency pushing you to act right now, without thinking
  2. The fact that it seems to come from your bank's number, so it must be legitimate
  3. The fact that it's a text message rather than a phone call
See the answer and the explanation

The right answer: A made-up sense of urgency pushing you to act right now, without thinking

Scammers manufacture urgency (“tonight,” “suspended”) to make you click before you can check anything. No real bank ever asks you to confirm your codes through a link in a text message. The move: call your bank yourself, using the number printed on the back of your card, before you click anything.

Related reflex(es) : 6. Too good to be true? · 2. What's the source?

What detail makes this offer clearly fake?

An email announces: “Congratulations! You've won 100,000 in a major international lottery.” You don't remember ever entering, but the email says it's automatic for anyone with an email address. To receive your prize, you're asked to send your personal and banking details.

  1. The amount is too large to be believable
  2. You don't remember entering, yet only people who actually enter can win
  3. Real lotteries ask for personal information by email to validate a win
See the answer and the explanation

The right answer: You don't remember entering, yet only people who actually enter can win

A real lottery only pays out if you bought a ticket or actually entered. No lottery randomly targets email addresses. The first reflex: if you don't remember entering, there's nothing waiting for you. The move: be especially suspicious of “automatic” wins, or prizes you supposedly won without even knowing you were in the running.

Related reflex(es) : 10. What if I'm the one who's wrong? · 6. Too good to be true?

Why should you never answer this?

A man calls you, saying he's your bank advisor. He explains there's been a fraud attempt on your account and he needs to verify your identity. He asks: “Can you give me your 4-digit security code, just to confirm it's really you?”

  1. Bank advisors don't pay attention to clients' security codes
  2. Saying a code out loud on the phone is risky because someone nearby might overhear it
  3. Your bank already has all your security codes on file - it never needs to ask for them over the phone
See the answer and the explanation

The right answer: Your bank already has all your security codes on file - it never needs to ask for them over the phone

Here's the golden rule: your real bank will NEVER ask for your security codes, passwords, or full card number over the phone. If someone demands it, that's a scam, full stop. The move: hang up and call your bank back yourself, on the official number printed on your card.

Related reflex(es) : 1. Who is speaking? · 2. What's the source?

What's the classic trap here?

On a classifieds site, you find an ad: a recent-model car, low mileage, priced 30% below market. The photo looks genuine. The seller says they need to sell fast because they're moving abroad, and asks for a deposit to “reserve” the car before you even see it.

  1. That the seller is moving abroad, so you couldn't take legal action later
  2. Demanding payment before letting you inspect the car
  3. That the car seems too new to be sold at that price
See the answer and the explanation

The right answer: Demanding payment before letting you inspect the car

The scheme is a classic: a very attractive price, manufactured urgency (“I'm leaving soon”), and a request for a deposit before you've seen the item. The money disappears, and so does the car - if it ever existed. The move: never send money before physically seeing both the item and the seller.

Related reflex(es) : 6. Too good to be true? · 7. What is it selling me?

What's the real mechanism here?

A friend invites you to an online meeting. They say they've found a “mutual support club” where everyone earns money just by inviting other people in. The more you invite, the more you earn. They show photos of happy people receiving bonuses. Joining is free at the start.

  1. It's free, so there's no risk in trying it
  2. It's a genuine mutual support system that banks simply don't like
  3. It's a pyramid scheme: only the people at the top win, funded by the money new members put in
See the answer and the explanation

The right answer: It's a pyramid scheme: only the people at the top win, funded by the money new members put in

Any system where you mainly earn by recruiting other people is a pyramid scheme. The only real winners are the earliest ones, and it always collapses eventually. Money from new members flows up to fund the earlier ones - there's no actual product or service generating it. The move: walk away the moment a system pushes recruiting harder than any real product or service.

Related reflex(es) : 7. What is it selling me? · 5. Who else is saying it?

What signal should stop you here?

You find a job listing that pays very well: a solid monthly salary, remote work, very few hours required. Before you can start, the company asks you to pay a fee for “mandatory training” or a “starter kit.” Without that payment, you can't even see the full job details.

  1. A real company hiring staff never asks candidates to pay money
  2. It's normal to have to pay for training
  3. Since the job is remote, the company must be covering its costs somewhere else
See the answer and the explanation

The right answer: A real company hiring staff never asks candidates to pay money

This is a dead giveaway: a real employer pays for your training, they don't charge you for it. If you're asked for money before you've even started a job, that's a recruitment scam. The money disappears, and the job never existed. The move: report listings like this.

Related reflex(es) : 1. Who is speaking? · 6. Too good to be true?

Why should you stay cautious anyway?

An email announces: “Good news! You're getting a 450 refund on your taxes. Click below to confirm your refund and receive the transfer within 48 hours.” The email is beautifully designed, with an official-looking logo.

  1. A real refund or tax rebate is first announced through an official letter, never through an email demanding an urgent click
  2. If the email has an official-looking logo, it must be genuine
  3. These days, all refunds happen by email
See the answer and the explanation

The right answer: A real refund or tax rebate is first announced through an official letter, never through an email demanding an urgent click

Scammers impersonate the organizations that actually pay out money - tax offices, insurers, postal services. An email demanding an urgent click to “confirm” something is almost always a trap. The real process is slower and far less dramatic. The move: never click a link in an email to claim a refund - go straight to the official site by typing the address in yourself.

Related reflex(es) : 2. What's the source? · 4. Does the image show what they claim?

What's the major trap here?

An ad leads you to a site: “Crypto investing, guaranteed. Earn 5% a day with our patented algorithm. Invest 1,000 today, withdraw 50,000 in three months.” The site displays five-star reviews and glowing testimonials. It's genuinely convincing.

  1. No algorithm can guarantee a steady 5% daily return - it's mathematically and financially impossible
  2. The site has positive reviews, so it must genuinely work
  3. Cryptocurrencies can't generate gains like this under any circumstances
See the answer and the explanation

The right answer: No algorithm can guarantee a steady 5% daily return - it's mathematically and financially impossible

Promises of “guaranteed” or “patented” returns in crypto - or anywhere else - are always scams. “Easy” returns like this don't exist; the money you put in simply disappears. The reviews are fake, built for the site. The move: walk away the moment someone promises fixed, massive gains, guaranteed or patented.

Related reflex(es) : 6. Too good to be true? · 8. Is the expert really an expert?

Medium

Before responding, what should you do first?

You get a message on a messaging app from a friend. They say they lost their wallet while traveling and can't access their bank account. They ask: “Could you lend me a large sum urgently? I'll pay you back the moment I'm home.” The tone feels natural, but it's odd that they'd ask you specifically.

  1. Transfer the money right away, since it's a friend and it's urgent
  2. Call them by phone or video to check that it's really them
  3. Send the money, after asking them to also cover the transfer fees
See the answer and the explanation

The right answer: Call them by phone or video to check that it's really them

This is a very common scam: a friend's account gets hijacked, and the scammer asks their contacts for urgent money. A real friend can wait ten minutes for a verification call. The move: always call the person directly, on a number you already know, before sending any money.

Related reflex(es) : 1. Who is speaking? · 10. What if I'm the one who's wrong?

What deserves checking before you order?

You find an online shop selling well-known clothing brands at 70% off. The prices are unbeatable. The site has only existed for two months, but the reviews are glowing (five stars across the board), and it accepts card payments. You're tempted to place an order.

  1. Steep discounts are normal for online shops, so there's no need to check anything
  2. If the site accepts card payments, it must be safe
  3. Whether the site genuinely exists, who runs it, its physical address, and its legal information
See the answer and the explanation

The right answer: Whether the site genuinely exists, who runs it, its physical address, and its legal information

A very new site with rock-bottom prices and suspiciously perfect reviews are warning signs. Sites like this often steal your payment details or ship counterfeit goods. The move: check the “about us” page, look for a physical address and legal information, then search the site's name plus the word “scam.” A legitimate site leaves verifiable traces.

Related reflex(es) : 2. What's the source? · 5. Who else is saying it?

Why stay cautious despite the detailed explanations?

A law firm contacts you by email. An inheritance is waiting for you, but there are several fees to settle first: processing fees, notification fees, international transfer fees. Each one is explained and sounds reasonable on its own. Added up, the total comes to a few thousand.

  1. Foreign law firms regularly reach out by email about inheritances, that's normal practice
  2. Legitimate inheritance fees go through a local notary or estate lawyer, never through payments to a stranger
  3. If every fee comes with an explanation, it must be justified
See the answer and the explanation

The right answer: Legitimate inheritance fees go through a local notary or estate lawyer, never through payments to a stranger

The scam has simply evolved: instead of one huge fee, it asks for several smaller payments that each sound reasonable. It's still a scam. A real local notary meets you in person and doesn't ask for odd advance payments like these. The move: consult a notary local to you BEFORE paying anything at all.

Related reflex(es) : 2. What's the source? · 6. Too good to be true?

What would actual finance experts say about these numbers?

A man offers you a special investment: “I've got an automated trading strategy. You put in a set amount, and every month I pay you back 10% in gains. It's tested, it's safe.” He shows you spreadsheets with impressive results stretching back two years.

  1. The spreadsheets prove the system works
  2. Automated trading strategies are real, and this kind of return is normal
  3. A steady 10% a month is impossible - no investment offers that kind of regularity. It's either mathematically false or a pyramid scheme
See the answer and the explanation

The right answer: A steady 10% a month is impossible - no investment offers that kind of regularity. It's either mathematically false or a pyramid scheme

Scammers love financial jargon and convincing-looking spreadsheets. 10% a month works out to over 120% a year, which would outperform every market on the planet. It's either impossible or a pyramid scheme stacking new investors on top of old ones. The move: look for verifiable proof - an actual financial license, and search online for complaints.

Related reflex(es) : 9. Does the number have context? · 8. Is the expert really an expert?

What's the trap here, even though the email looks like it's really from your bank?

You get an email carrying your bank's logo. Subject line: “Security update required.” The message asks you to verify your identity by clicking a link, or your account will be suspended. The link leads to a page that looks almost identical to the real site.

  1. A real bank never asks you to click an email link to verify your identity
  2. If the fake page imitates the real site closely enough, it counts as official
  3. Security update emails like this are normal and safe
See the answer and the explanation

The right answer: A real bank never asks you to click an email link to verify your identity

Scammers copy the design specifically to fool you. A real bank will NEVER ask you to click an email link to verify your identity. It only ever asks by calling you, or through its official site when you type the address in yourself. The move: ignore “security” links in emails - go straight to the site by typing the address.

Related reflex(es) : 2. What's the source? · 4. Does the image show what they claim?

What should you check before making that payment?

On a rental site, you find a nicely located three-room apartment, brand new, with a view, priced 40% below others in the area. The owner says they want to rent it out fast because they're retiring. They ask for a security deposit before you even sign a lease.

  1. Meet the owner in person, see the apartment, check their papers and the property deed, and sign a lease
  2. If the owner accepts a bank transfer, that makes it legitimate
  3. Rock-bottom prices like this are common, so there's no need to check anything
See the answer and the explanation

The right answer: Meet the owner in person, see the apartment, check their papers and the property deed, and sign a lease

It's a classic scheme: an appealing ad, a price well below market, manufactured urgency, and a deposit requested before you've even seen the place. The scammer may be renting the same apartment to several people at once, or may not own it at all. The move: never send money without seeing the home, meeting the owner, and signing an actual lease.

Related reflex(es) : 6. Too good to be true? · 1. Who is speaking?

Why is a “refund guarantee” suspicious here?

A group on social media promotes: “Secure crypto trading platform. Start with a small stake, earn a fixed daily payout, guaranteed. Not happy after 30 days? Full refund.” It's all written out clearly, and the offer looks carefully put together.

  1. If it's guaranteed, that makes it legitimate
  2. No crypto platform can guarantee steady returns. The guarantee is bait - the money either disappears or gets frozen once the deadline passes
  3. Crypto platforms that offer a guarantee are regulated and trustworthy
See the answer and the explanation

The right answer: No crypto platform can guarantee steady returns. The guarantee is bait - the money either disappears or gets frozen once the deadline passes

Crypto scammers offer a “guarantee” specifically to reassure people and pull them in. After 30 days, the account freezes, the company vanishes, or it suddenly demands fees to “unlock” your funds. There's no real regulator standing behind any of it. The move: walk away the moment guaranteed crypto returns or no-questions refunds are promised.

Related reflex(es) : 6. Too good to be true? · 8. Is the expert really an expert?

What's the main trap here?

You've ordered a package from abroad. An email announces a customs issue. To release the package, you're told to pay a small customs fee through a payment link. The email appears to come from an official shipping carrier.

  1. Customs fees are normal and should be paid to the carrier
  2. If the email looks official, it must be
  3. Real customs fees are paid in person at delivery, never through an email link. This is a fake-fee scam
See the answer and the explanation

The right answer: Real customs fees are paid in person at delivery, never through an email link. This is a fake-fee scam

The scammer is impersonating a shipping carrier. Real customs fees get paid in person, at delivery - never through an email link. The link leads to a fake payment page where your money disappears, and the package was never really held up in the first place. The move: call the carrier directly, on its official number, if you're ever unsure.

Related reflex(es) : 2. What's the source? · 7. What is it selling me?

What's the real mechanism here, despite the legal-looking front?

A mutual savings group invites you to join. The structure looks legitimate: official bylaws, a named president, monthly meetings. You pay in a set amount, receive an interest-free credit worth much more, and are expected to recruit other members. The more you recruit, the more points you earn.

  1. It's legitimate, since there's a proper administrative structure behind it
  2. It's a sophisticated pyramid scheme: only the earliest members gain; new members' money funds the earlier ones, not any real credit
  3. It's a genuine cooperative system, as long as the bylaws are written down properly
See the answer and the explanation

The right answer: It's a sophisticated pyramid scheme: only the earliest members gain; new members' money funds the earlier ones, not any real credit

Modern pyramid schemes hide behind bylaws, meetings, and a convincing legal front. But the money comes from recruitment, not from any real economic activity. The collapse is only a matter of time. The move: be wary of any system that pushes recruitment harder than an actual product or service.

Related reflex(es) : 7. What is it selling me? · 5. Who else is saying it?

What should alert you first?

A charismatic man starts a “savvy investors” group chat. He shares “exclusive” investment tips supposedly before the market catches on. His clients apparently made 30% in six months. He offers a spot in the group for a fee.

  1. It's a great opportunity, since experts are sharing their tips
  2. If a tip were genuinely that profitable and exclusive, nobody would sell access to it for a small fee in a group chat. That's a con artist's move
  3. If people really made 30%, the advice must be legitimate
See the answer and the explanation

The right answer: If a tip were genuinely that profitable and exclusive, nobody would sell access to it for a small fee in a group chat. That's a con artist's move

This is a con artist playing the role of expert. The “clients” who supposedly made 30% are often accomplices, or cherry-picked success stories. Genuine finance professionals don't hand out exclusive winning tips through a paid group chat. The move: consult advisors who are actually licensed by your country's financial regulator.

Related reflex(es) : 8. Is the expert really an expert? · 5. Who else is saying it?

Tough

How can you be sure this is a real promo and not a trick?

A big clothing retailer launches an online flash sale. Items are marked “60% off,” but only for 24 hours on certain collections. The discounted prices look realistic compared to typical sales. You need to click fast, or you'll miss it.

  1. If it says “60% off,” that must be true
  2. Compare it to the price a few days earlier (search for the item before the sale) and check whether other sites are running a similar promo
  3. It has to be a scam, since real promos are never this big
See the answer and the explanation

The right answer: Compare it to the price a few days earlier (search for the item before the sale) and check whether other sites are running a similar promo

Real promos genuinely exist. But you shouldn't trust the sticker alone - a “discounted” price can be inflated first, so the discount looks bigger than it is. The real move: check what the item cost before the “sale” and compare it across other sites. Real deals are out there, but they still need checking.

Related reflex(es) : 9. Does the number have context? · 2. What's the source?

What makes this offer suspicious despite its legitimate appearance?

Your employer offers you a raise. It's unexpected, and you're thrilled. But to receive the raise right away, you're told you have to accept it in cryptocurrency instead of regular pay. The reasoning given: “It's our new policy, to stay modern.”

  1. A raise must be genuine if it's coming from your employer
  2. It's a great opportunity to earn in crypto
  3. No real company pays salaries in cryptocurrency - it's unstable and doesn't meet legal payroll requirements
See the answer and the explanation

The right answer: No real company pays salaries in cryptocurrency - it's unstable and doesn't meet legal payroll requirements

This is a sophisticated trap: the raise itself might be real, but the crypto payment is where the scam hides. Once your pay is converted, control of that wallet can slip away, and the balance vanishes. No genuine company imposes a system like this. The move: refuse any salary paid in crypto - insist on regular currency landing in your actual bank account.

Related reflex(es) : 10. What if I'm the one who's wrong? · 7. What is it selling me?

Does this offer seem legitimate?

An investment fund offers you a supplementary retirement plan with an average return of 4% a year. That's lower than in the past, but the company is upfront that rates are simply low right now. The fund is registered with the relevant financial regulator. You can withdraw your money anytime, subject to a notice period.

  1. No, it must be a scam because the return is too low
  2. Yes, but you should still verify the fund's real identity, its registered address, its certifications, and compare its fees before signing anything
  3. Yes, since it's regulated, it's automatically safe
See the answer and the explanation

The right answer: Yes, but you should still verify the fund's real identity, its registered address, its certifications, and compare its fees before signing anything

This is a case where the offer really could be genuine. But “possible” doesn't mean “safe.” The move: confirm the fund actually exists on the official regulatory register, identify who regulates it, compare its fees, and read the full contract. Even a regulated offer deserves checking before you sign.

Related reflex(es) : 2. What's the source? · 10. What if I'm the one who's wrong?

What should alarm you in hindsight?

You get an email from your bank announcing a new mobile payment feature. It's perfectly formatted, uses your full name, and the link leads to a page that looks exactly like the real thing. You click through and enter your username and password. Afterward, the page just says: “Verification in progress, please try again in an hour.”

  1. The page said “verification in progress,” so you should just wait it out
  2. It arrived as an email rather than a text message
  3. You just handed your login details to a fake page. No real bank would ever ask for this by email, even on a page that looks convincing
See the answer and the explanation

The right answer: You just handed your login details to a fake page. No real bank would ever ask for this by email, even on a page that looks convincing

The trap here is subtle: the email looks real, and the page copies the genuine site almost perfectly. But no bank will ever ask for your login credentials through an email, period. The move: always go directly to the site by typing the address yourself, never through a link in an email.

Related reflex(es) : 2. What's the source? · 4. Does the image show what they claim?

Should you dismiss this ad outright?

An ad offers a studio apartment in a lesser-known part of town, well outside the center. The price is 50% below comparable listings. The ad explains: “Low demand in this area, owner selling due to health reasons, no agency involved.” The photos look clear and genuine, and the owner has a local number and is happy to arrange a viewing.

  1. No, but you should verify things: meet the owner, see the place, ask for the property deed, and confirm the rental is legitimate
  2. Yes, it's a scam simply because the price is abnormally low
  3. No, the explanations given are clear enough to just trust
See the answer and the explanation

The right answer: No, but you should verify things: meet the owner, see the place, ask for the property deed, and confirm the rental is legitimate

This is a genuinely nuanced case: the explanation could easily be true - a less sought-after area really can mean a lower price. But it's also textbook scammer language. The move: don't dismiss it, but verify carefully BEFORE any payment changes hands. A legitimate rental, a verified owner, a deed you've actually seen.

Related reflex(es) : 10. What if I'm the one who's wrong? · 1. Who is speaking?

Why is something that sounds generous actually much less attractive?

A site advertises: “Pay with our virtual card, earn 10% cashback on everything you buy.” That's the big, bold claim. In small print underneath: “Cashback capped at a small monthly amount, valid for 24 months, paid out as non-transferable vouchers on our partner site.”

  1. 10% sounds huge, but the conditions shrink the real benefit drastically - most buyers will never see anything close to the advertised 10%
  2. It's a genuine opportunity, since the cashback does technically exist
  3. Conditions written in small print don't carry any legal weight
See the answer and the explanation

The right answer: 10% sounds huge, but the conditions shrink the real benefit drastically - most buyers will never see anything close to the advertised 10%

The offer isn't technically false, but it's built to mislead. The big, bold 10% promise gets neutralized by fine print - a low monthly cap, an expiry date, repayment in vouchers instead of cash. The move: ALWAYS read the fine print; it very often contradicts the headline promise sitting above it.

Related reflex(es) : 4. Does the image show what they claim? · 9. Does the number have context?

What's wrong with this very realistic-looking scenario?

A law firm contacts you with what looks like an official letter. There's a genuine inheritance from a distant relative who passed away last year. The paperwork looks solid: correct names, a verifiable date of death, a reasonable amount. To receive the money, you need to sign papers with a notary. But the firm first asks for a sum in “advance registration fees.”

  1. If all the paperwork looks in order, it must be real
  2. Registration fees get paid AFTER an estate is settled, never before. That's a scam signal even when everything else checks out
  3. Real notaries sometimes ask for a deposit to open a file
See the answer and the explanation

The right answer: Registration fees get paid AFTER an estate is settled, never before. That's a scam signal even when everything else checks out

This is the hard version of the trap: the scammer genuinely did their homework - a real relative, a real death, a believable amount. But they insist on an advance payment. A real notary never operates that way. The move: consult a notary local to where the death occurred yourself, never the one the other party suggests.

Related reflex(es) : 2. What's the source? · 6. Too good to be true?

Why stay cautious despite this appearance of legality?

A company registered in the official business registry - you can verify it yourself - offers a structured investment plan. You put in a set amount, and over five years you're promised a fixed annual payout, GUARANTEED. The structure is legal, the paperwork is current, and the registered address is real.

  1. If it's officially registered, there's no risk at all
  2. A written guarantee is always legally binding no matter what
  3. No annuity can truly be guaranteed; if the company collapses or turns out to be a scam, the guarantee disappears with it. Being legally registered doesn't prove financial soundness
See the answer and the explanation

The right answer: No annuity can truly be guaranteed; if the company collapses or turns out to be a scam, the guarantee disappears with it. Being legally registered doesn't prove financial soundness

Being legally registered isn't the same as being honest or financially stable. A scammer can set up a genuine company purely to disappear after collecting everyone's money. Written “guarantees” are worthless once the money is gone. The move: look for real financial history, independent reviews, and complaints filed with regulators.

Related reflex(es) : 5. Who else is saying it? · 10. What if I'm the one who's wrong?

What doesn't add up here, despite everything looking legitimate?

You bought something online. An email announces: “Refund approved. Download your payment confirmation to finalize it.” The link leads to a secure-looking page. A few minutes later, you get a call from what looks like an official number, asking you to confirm the refund by giving your account number.

  1. It's normal to need an extra confirmation step
  2. The combined process - an email followed by a call demanding personal data - is suspicious. No platform needs TWO separate steps for a simple refund
  3. If the page looks secure and the call seems official, it really must be the platform
See the answer and the explanation

The right answer: The combined process - an email followed by a call demanding personal data - is suspicious. No platform needs TWO separate steps for a simple refund

This one's subtle: each step looks plausible on its own, but together they form a trap. Email followed by phone call is a classic pattern for a more sophisticated scam. A real platform would send you a single email and stop there. The move: never give banking details over a phone call, even one that sounds completely official.

Related reflex(es) : 10. What if I'm the one who's wrong? · 2. What's the source?

How do you decide, without more information?

Your friend tells you about an investment they made: they put a set amount with a small, local asset management firm. Two years later, they got back a bit more than they put in. They say it's normal - a modest but safe return. You have no idea whether this is a scam or completely legitimate. Your friend clearly has no bad intentions.

  1. It's a scam, because the return is too low to be worth it
  2. There's no way to decide without checking the company itself - its registration, its certifications, and requesting official documentation. Only verification counts here, not trust in a friend
  3. If your friend really got the money back, it must be legal
See the answer and the explanation

The right answer: There's no way to decide without checking the company itself - its registration, its certifications, and requesting official documentation. Only verification counts here, not trust in a friend

This is the ultimate nuanced case: you genuinely can't conclude anything yet. Your friend could have been scammed without realizing it - some scammers pay early “gains” using money from newer members. Or it really could be legitimate. The move: verify the company independently, read the actual contract, and ask exactly where the money is invested.

Related reflex(es) : 2. What's the source? · 5. Who else is saying it?

Keyboard shortcuts

?Open this help
EscClose the panel or this help
1 – 3Pick an answer during the quiz
EnterNext case, once you've read the answer
TabMove from link to link — the whole site works by keyboard